On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:57:20 -0600, "Rob Landley" <[email protected]> said: > On Monday 29 December 2008 21:52:11 Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 December 2008 01:56, Dan E wrote: > > > The mailing list seems to be broken since around 17 December 2008. > > > > Broken in what way? > > I suspect he's referring to the mailing list archive, and just not > communicating clearly. Look at all the "no subject" entries at the > bottom of > http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2008-December/thread.html (which > is > what the web page currently points to) and tell me that's normal.
Yep. That plus I was seeing no traffic at all coming across from the list. I also replied (or thought I did) to a post right around the same time and it bounced with a cryptic message about email relaying, so I figured something was borked. The bounce thing was on my end. This web email client does weird things with the address fields when you reply to a mailing list article. > P.S. Please drop "[email protected]" when replying to this thread > unless you're reporting a new bug with one of OSU's servers. Poor > Lance has enough on his plate. :) Done. Another artifact of this horrible web email client when clicking "Reply All". The reply quote formatting is a mess, too. I'll be rectifying the situation shortly. Thanks for the info about the list server. It was misinterpretation on my part, but it looked for all the world like the list had just died. Nothing incoming, refusals on outgoing and the archives looked like they had stopped updating. After a few days of that I started to get worried :) -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
