Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Mikael Lund Jepsen, ICCC wrote:
  
H.Heinold wrote:
    
Hi,

thanks four your effort, but this already know and will be checked in
after the nptl-merge. 
      
Hi all,
Just out of curiosity: why is such a change not committed to trunk just 
because there is nptl work going on in a separate branch?
If linuxthreads in the trunk is known to be broken and a fix is ready, 
IMHO it should be committed - even if that is one more change that needs 
merging into the nptl branch.

Just my 2 cents
Mikael
    

Hi,
uclibc developers provide their contribution to uclibc by free, when
they have time to spent for contributing to this fantastic project.

So, review and commit may need time, and not all are always ready
for doing this.
People may be on holidays some time, may be tired or may be on sick
leave. So just wait for someone will have enough time to review, comment
and commit.
Please be patience.
  
Hi,
I'm well aware of the way things work, and certainly appreciate the time and effort contributors spend on the project :-)
My post was in no way meant as a criticism of the speed of the project, far from it.
I was just curious to know if known fixes for trunk (in general) were being held back due to the nptl work. I think that would be unfortunate, so if that was the case I would just highlight it.

Thanks,
Mikael
Thanks,
Carmelo
  
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

    

  

--


Mikael Lund Jepsen, Software Engineer

ICCC A/S, Telegrafvej 5 B, 2750 Ballerup, DENMARK

Phone: +45 44 86 04 00
Direct: +45 44 86 04 25
Fax: +45 44 86 03 99
   
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.iccc.dk
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to