Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
What is 'query_profile' supposed to do? I don't see that function in glibc
either.. Typo?
Yes, type - sorry - meant to write query_module
$ grep _24 .config
UCLIBC_LINUX_MODULE_24=y
$ nm -D --def lib/libuClibc-0.9.30.so | grep module
0000d3a8 T create_module
0000d456 T delete_module
0000e92a T init_module
0000fc00 T query_module
I only get
$ grep _24 .config
UCLIBC_LINUX_MODULE_24=y
$ nm -D --def lib/libuClibc-0.9.30.so | grep module
0000a8bc T create_module
0000a8d4 T delete_module
0000b46c T init_module
.. so I must do something different/wrong. Is there any other
configuration related stuff besides the config file that can have an
influence?
If oprofile has no possibility to force off legacy support then fix oprofile.
Check if configury (mis-)detects your target kernelversion. Check if
there is a --disable-liblegacy, if not add one (defaulting to something
sensible for the detected kernel version, i.e. off in your case).
Yes, I looked for something like this, but did not find anything, except
--without-*, which did not work (--without-liblegacy).
I've just stumbled across buildroot, rev. 24936 (5 weeks old) which adds
a "no query_module" patch (although it seems to unconditionally remove
the entire function containing the query_module call - even for 2.4
kernels. Looks a bit strange to me). I will check if it works.
I wouldn't use OABI.
Neither would I, but I had runtime problem with udev when I went EABI...
Unfortunately I did not have time to investigate this further at that
time...
If anyone knows of EABI-problems with at91rm9200 from Atmel, I'm very
interested in hearing about it...
Thanks,
Mikael
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
