On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:58:21AM -0800, Ned Ludd wrote: >On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 12:07 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:07:43AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> >Hash: SHA1 >> > >> >[email protected] wrote: >> >> Author: aldot >> >> Date: 2008-10-03 07:24:28 -0700 (Fri, 03 Oct 2008) >> >> New Revision: 23582 >> >> >> >> Log: >> >> - add long double math wrappers (Ned Ludd) >> >> >Hi Berhard, >> >any reason I don't know for not having include TARGET_sh among >> >archs supporting long double ? >> >> I do not immediately see why there is any arch limit. >> >> Solar, why was this long double math support arch specific? > >I'm not aware of any reason why TARGET_sh would need to be filtered. It >was probably an oversight. > >Anything break when enabled?
Does anybody remember the story behind __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH? Let's take powerpc32 as an example. Can sombody please show be $ nm -D /lib/libm.so.* | grep finite from some recent glibc's libm on a powerpc32? To be specific, i want to know if that one contains finitel or not. If it does, please show me the disas of it. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
