-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 March 2009 23:41:39 Sagar Borikar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We wanted to add NPTL support on our platform built in uClibc. While
>> browsing, I figured out that 0.9.30 was supposed to merge the
>> uclibc-nptl branch. But in the sources I don't see that. Can anyone
>> let me know the status?
> 
> Its not merged yet.
> 
>> I also find that uclibc-nptl branch  varies a lot compared to trunk.
> 
> Yes one reason is that it was carved out log ago.
> 
>> Shall I consider uclibc-nptl branch production ready?
> 

concerning sh, definitely yes: actually used on production !

> Its got some testing on sh and arm but for mips there has not been any 
> testing 
> lately. 
> 
>> All pointers are welcome
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sagar
>> _______________________________________________
>> uClibc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkm4tVcACgkQoRq/3BrK1s8omgCbBkPgiWxGlIzwQjoU2sXif+Kp
CMgAni+lO3y+LS1RAeDpAxigFXEIKNXZ
=UK3a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to