Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 10 April 2009 01:07:52 Timo Teräs wrote: >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Thursday 09 April 2009 10:24:53 Cristi Magherusan wrote: >>>> Is there anyone interested in porting the NPTL branch to x86/x86-64? >>> always interested in accepting patches, but no one appears to be >>> interested in doing the porting work atm >> Did you all miss the mail I sent yesterday? >> >> http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-April/042289.html > > i saw it, but i generally skim over things that make me go to an external > location
The patch is about 70 kB. I find it good practice to send large (as in over 40-50kB) patches as URLs instead of as attachment/inline. But I can send it as attachment too if wanted. I just noticed that some changes there are probably not right based on the recent MIPS patch discussion. E.g. pthread_cleanup_push_defer related things. Also wondering if the NPTL version is planned for update? The nptl branch is based on pretty old snapshot. - Timo _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
