On Monday 11 May 2009 15:33:51 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2009, Rob Landley wrote: > > Both -stable and -svn need the attached patches in order for armv5l-eabi > > and armv6l-eabi to work for me. > > The first patch should not be needed since these functions should only be > needed to resolve unresolved references in shared libc, and the second > certainly seems wrong since any program actually unwinding should get the > real versions of these functions from libgcc_s / libgcc_eh, not the dummy > versions from shared libc; those need to be hidden so nothing else ever > links against them.
If you build gcc with --disable-shared there isn't a libgcc_s or libgcc_eh, and libgcc.a hasn't got 'em. What do you recommend in that case? (If you don't build gcc with --disable-shared, you need a libc.so to link libgcc_s.so against before you've built a compiler with which to build that libc.so. Chicken and egg problem.) Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
