On Monday 14 July 2008 10:16:34 [email protected] wrote: > Author: aldot > Date: 2008-07-14 07:16:31 -0700 (Mon, 14 Jul 2008) > New Revision: 22828 > > Log: > - do not force LFS unto x86_64 folks > vapier, you added this in r12384. What was the reasoning back then?
some features exist only in the newer 64bit kernel functions, and the overhead for LFS on 64bit systems is trivial -- the 64bit functions should be aliases to the normal functions. what exactly was the problem with enabling LFS here ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
