On Monday 23 November 2009 02:26:44 Austin Foxley wrote: > On 11/22/2009 07:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > how exactly did you confirm ? dynamic x86_64 binaries seem to be running > > fine for me.
The bug I reported was in i686, not x86_64. > Crap, I started trying to figure out why that change caused it to crash, > and it stopped crashing... Possibly because you started testing x86_64 instead of i686 after reading mike's message? > I think maybe there was something screwed up with my buildroot? I need > some sleep. Sleep is good. :) Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
