-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Austin Foxley wrote: > On 12/09/2009 11:09 AM, Chris Metcalf wrote: >> My proposed fix is something like the following, in dl-tls.c. (I'm >> running code patched up from the old SVN NPTL branch, but looking at the >> latest GIT NPTL it seems pretty similar here.) Obviously a real patch >> would re-indent all the code contained within the scope for which I >> removed the "if" test. > > Haven't tried your patch yet, but it looks reasonable. This code is > actually pretty much unaltered since it came from glibc, and current > glibc still looks like it has it. You might want to send an email to > their list about this as well. > > -Austin > >
Chris's comments definitely require for me looking again at TLS details much more deeply than I've done last time. I'll try to give a try at least on sh. Cheers, Carmelo > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAksnmBgACgkQoRq/3BrK1s9GsQCgwC+wPYP77fcc3u7JIfgGYjh+ 3boAoM/5NGiS7gLRzIJa8um9vI9iHM9f =VVPO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
