-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/23/2010 08:15 PM, Kevin Day wrote: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git;a=commit;h=d4c893f20758ff549e4aaa4a02a79e563deaebb9 > > Look at the performance and compatibility section of that commit. > > They only mention glibc. > Does uClibc follow the same behavior as glibc in the case or is it different?
Only the nptl branch even uses futexes, and in this case we are the same as glibc. We always expect to explicitly initialize futexes before doing a FUTEX_WAIT. Thanks, - -Austin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktch/sACgkQZoBfmtkl39PvrQCgjVl1Pzhxalb/wggvBKy2FmmJ qfUAn2m8HdZDib18+s8GAG5LX3Qy9wzi =Psrb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
