On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:14:09 +0100 "Yann E. MORIN" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snipp> > > There is an option of supporting UC3 > > architecture as well, but it is highly experimental, so lets just keep > > it simple until there is something actually working. > > It's not currently in the code, is it? IIUC, UC3 is yet another variant, > right? So again, it should be up to the user to provide a properly set-up > gcc. > Exactly, eventual patches for UC3 architecture should add whatever is necessary to compile uClibc for that architecture. -- Best regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
