On 03/03/2010 03:04 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:44:38PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> Because efforts would be spend on releasing .31 and merging/ creating >> another RC immediately after >> will divide the efforts. > > I would like a release that works on m68k. The current master tree does. > So why wait for NPTL?
Because NPTL won't (crosses fingers) break it. You would be able to continue to use lt/lt.old on m68k even without nptl support. > Now if NPTL can go in an get working in a month or so, then sure I could > see waiting for that. It it is going to be 6 to 12 month or more then > I certainly can't see waiting for that. I would estimate we could get it in and tested well enough in the time frame Bernhard mentioned for .31. -Austin _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
