On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:34:04PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:41:23AM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote:
>>On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> uClibc master is frozen in preparation of 0.9.31.
>>
>>That was good news! Congratulations!
>>
>>Is NPTL planned to go in there?
>
>0.9.31 is an checkpoint release to let people use all the good
>improvements that went into master since 0.9.30 was branched (including
>m68k fixes, etc).

out now.
>>
>>> The only (non-documentation) changes that may be made are changes that
>>> fix bugs or add new ports which do not require changes to other parts of
>>> the library. New functionality may not be introduced during this period.
>>>
>>> Known bugs that would be nice to get verified and fixed are:
>>> https://bugs.uclibc.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=uClibc
>>> Pick any three :)
>>
>>Feels a bit meaningless to work on those linuxthreads bugs when NPTL
>>is on the way.
>
>verifying here means to check if they are still relevant on NPTL and if
>so, fix them there, otherwise note in the bug that it is fixed in .32

This was not yet done AFAIK. Any help with this is urgently wanted, we
aim for a .32 end of june, FYI
>
>>> I expect that the freeze will last at most two months and after that
>>> 0.9.31 will be branched and master will be re-opened.
>>>
>>> happy bug fixing,
>>> Bernhard
>>
>>Would it be an idea to make a beta release?
>
>you can checkout the branch any time and we will definitely have
>0.9.32-rcs as soon as 0.9.31 is out.

and there were.
Anyway.
Austin, khem, if you don't merge NPTL within a few days, i'll do it on
your behalf.

>From NPTL on we will officially require a C99 compatible compiler to
compile (just because the SINGLE_THREAD_P or however it's called is
implemented in a distgusting way. Pity, isn't it, but heck. /me pets
GCC ;)

cheers,
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to