On 4/6/10, Natanael Copa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Kevin Day <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am using the NPTL branch on x86, which works perfectly fine (in > > fact, better than any other stable release since 0.9.28) > > The commit number is: cca45baf8353d1e338d232f5bdb2d1d6b357f1da > > > (http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?h=nptl&id=cca45baf8353d1e338d232f5bdb2d1d6b357f1da) > > > > With the addition of the commit, the program claws-mail fails to > > respond to SMTP servers and throws an annoyingly useless error. > > At first glance I assumed that this to be a claws-mail problem. > > > > Somehow adding support for timeout and attempts in resolv.conf breaks > > claws-mail. > > > > When I revert those changes in mentioned commit, recompile uClibc, and > > run claws-mail again, it works. > > > FWIW, I have issues with claws-mail with imaps on uclibc-0.9.30.x. SSL > handshake error. I think its gnutls causing that. sylpheed with > openssl works just fine. > > -- > > Natanael Copa >
The SSL portions work if I use an IP address instead of a domain name. I get a certificate, accept, and continue. Mails in both directions work. So if this were SSL, then it is an SSL+resolve issue and not just a resolve issue. I am also wondering if it is libetpan, which claws-mail includes and uses. FYI: I am using the following NPTL commits because they work rather well: older version: 784e157fadbf1622d381e7dc9e82d2510a690776 newer version: f7eba78a7464c7b31326abf92dab254608835028 More recent ones prior to the resync with 0.9.3* do not compile. I have yet to get around to trying the NPTL after the resync to 0.9.3*. -- Kevin Day _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
