Special-coding x86_64 is unacceptable. I have a proposed patch pending for 0.9.31ff, will CFT ASAP.
On 25 Apr 2010 20:59, "Roman I Khimov" <[email protected]> wrote: В сообщении от Воскресенье 25 апреля 2010 21:34:14 автор Austin Foxley написал: > On 04/25/2010 06:35 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > In previous uclibc versions we've had fcntl64 (nonexisting on x86_64) as > > an alias to fcntl. ... > What about other 64bit archs? At quick glance most of them have no fcntl64, although looks like sh64 does. > And you're right, we probably want a different solution to this. Sure, this is mostly to raise the issue and solve it at least internally. It's been a long time since I've touched uclibc code, so I'm very unsure about how to fix it properly. Most probably still in headers (re-adding fcntl64 alias seems ugly to me) though. -- http://roman.khimov.ru mailto: [email protected] gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3 _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
