On 4/26/2010 6:58 PM, Scott Esters wrote: > Is there a compelling reason for keeping the older style sigaction.h > header in the ARM NPTL branch, but using the newer sigaction.h header in > the standard uClibc release? I've read through the archives but have not > gleaned a reason they're different. > > Thanks, > Scott Esters, AF6RT
Hi, there is not an ARM NPTL branch... may you specify exactly the full path of the header you are referring too ? carmelo > > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
