В сообщении от Среда 05 мая 2010 20:47:36 автор Rafael Diniz написал: > And how about x86_64, is uclibc/nptl running fine?
With all fixes I've submitted recently there are still some problems left as per nptl tests: tst-cancel7 tst-cond8 tst-mutex8 tst-once3 tst-once4 For this group it seems that cancellations need more love on x86_64. tst-cputimer*, although that work same as glibc versions apart from cputimer2 which fails with "thread CPU clock timer support missing, skipping test" here. tst-mqueue3 tst-mqueue5 tst-mqueue6 tst-mqueue8 Something is broken in mqueues. All of above is considered non-critical for our project, but still it'd be nice to fix those if anyone cares and/or interested. In generic code I have tst-tls13 and tst-tls16 failing, but that seems to be because of LAZY relocations, tst_wcsftime, didn't look into that closely and floating-point tests have some errors (that are also present when compiled for glibc and thus considered non-harmful) and differences in corner case handling (like pow(1, NaN) and such). -- http://roman.khimov.ru mailto: [email protected] gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
