On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:30:05PM +0200, Raphael 'kena' Poss wrote: >Dear all, > >I'm currently evaluating uClibc for a new in-house architecture. While running >math tests, I came across the following behavior: with 0.9.30.1 and the >default build options, tgamma(x) returns the same as lgamma(x) for most values >of x.
we've had 0.9.30.2 and 0.9.30.3, 0.9.31 and other changes since 0.9.30.1. Please check against current master, if it works there but not with 0.9.31 then it's a regression. If it doesn't work on master then it's a bug ( http://uclibc.org/FAQ#bugs ). _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
