On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Jones Desougi wrote: >When a string format is processed and the argument is NULL, this yields >"(null)" regardless of precision. This does not make sense, precision >should not be exceeded. A simple test shows that glibc outputs nothing >if precision is smaller than six and the attached patch implements this >same behaviour.
This question seems to pop up repeatedly. I think that the current implementation is better since it makes programming errors more obvious. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
