On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:42:48PM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: >On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: >> I hate to bring up the word "release" on this list, but is there any chance >> of >> integrating this patch actually meaning something in the forseeable future? > >I wonder the same.
Sorry, i've been busy buring Onkel Emil and taking over his duties to prepare $HOME for the winter. > >I am about to create the second release of Alpine Linux based off a >git snapshot of uclibc. Atleast for x86 the git master with NPTL have >been very stable recently, infact better than any previous release. > >What are the big show stoppers for next uclibc release? Well, I need to merge in microblaze (pending input, not a show-stopper but would be nice) but other than that, i'm not aware of any other blockers for 0.9.32.. are you? Let's install a mental countdown.. burry my grandma on 4th (7th death in my family during the last 12 months -- literally. uncool, ain't it :( ), resurrect microblaze tuesday/wednesday next week (that'd be 9th-10th) declare an RC1 on 20101111, finish theme-suppoert for open-phd-guiding, wait a week then release uClibc-0.9.32. So.. outstanding issues for 0.9.32, code-wise? _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
