On (09/02/11 20:48), Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:38:00PM -0600, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > >Behalf Of Bernhard Reutner- > >> Fischer > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 1:33 PM > >> To: [email protected]; Rob Landley; [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: A modest proposal: call it 1.0 > >> Where '+' means ported, 'o' means TODO/needs verification > >> o mips > > > >I'm using NPTL on Mips, if you consider this verification, then you have > >it. > > i've updated the TODO file accordingly. > > > >I too support the bump to 1.0 -- why wait? > > why not wait. Remember that it's a version number, nothing more. See > TODO
Its just not number IMHO. Its a statement which reflects our progress and stating 1.0 is right at present. We have had major feature in form of nptl and I have always been suggesting that we call it 1.0 when we release nptl. TODO list can be adjusted to be part of 1.2 for SuS compatibility Thanks -Khem > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
