On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 05:02:05 Alfeiks Kaänoken wrote: > My first review of the existing sysdeps and other source code > shows me that there are many linux-specific code (yes, > I mean linux specific code that resides within non-os specific > code).
patches welcome. linuxisms should only exist under libc/sysdeps/linux/ for the C library. > btw, the main difference with linux (or other monolithic OSes) is > many OS functions (open() for example) aren't syscalls - it's > RPC functions (yes, actually it will be a syscall that call IPC > function to send an RPC message). In this case I need to > find a better way to port it (i.e. without heavy modifications to > keep uclibc sources tree more closely to the upstream one). > Could you advice me something ? the linux syscalls should all live in libc/sysdeps/linux/ already, so if you had libc/sysdeps/jari/, it should be OK. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
