"Zdeněk Materna" <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello, I'm new to embedded Linux developing and I would like to ask - is there 
any issue with nanosleep function? Clock_nanosleep is unimplemented in uClibc 
(right?) so I planed to use nanosleep instead of it. But it doesn't work for me 
- program hangs on it forever. Usleep works, but it's not good alternative, 
isn't it? I'm also going to utilize timers - are there any issues about them? 
However google didn't give me much answers. Thanks for response and sorry for 
poor english. My environment: uClibc 0.9.31, ARM (AT91SAM9260), kernel 2.6.33.7 
(with RT path and hi-res timers enabled). Best regards, Zdenek 
Materna_____________________________________________
uClibc mailing list [email protected] 
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc 


Hi,

clock_nanosleep was added just recently (to master).
Can you provide a small, self-contained example for the hang you see with 
nanosleep, please?
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to