On (11/03/11 13:59), Imre Kaloz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:33:59 +0100, Peter Mazinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> I have a patch around since 2007 for arm, could anyone check if it is > >>valid and > >>>> apply it? > >>>> > >>> I've a gcc 4.5.0 configured as arm-cortex-linux-gnueabi and __ARM_EABI__ > >>> is actually defined. So changes looks fine to me. > >>> > >> > >>gcc wont be issue. If other compilers are used and don't have this > >>define builtin but chances are small of such a case. > > > >everywhere I can see __ARM_EABI__ is used, one hunk would be no problem. The > >question is rather, do you want the consistency check in > >uClibc_arch_features.h? > > > What about Yann's patchset [1]?
I have then waiting for 0.9.32 to release. I will queue it there too > > > Imre > > [1] http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2011-January/044599.html > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc -- -Khem _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
