>> the point is to not have the overhead of an indirect pointer in the >> non-threaded case. are you suggesting we force that overhead when it >> is unnecessary ? > yes
No thanks. Some of us out there still know how to write software without threads, and we would very much like to be able to keep using a lean, clean libc and build executables that are *not* polluted by the overwhelming "threads or gtfo" fad. -- Laurent _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
