On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Mike Frysinger dixit: >>tailing to __syscall_error is probably a wise decision > > OK, so how about this? Waldemar has tested this by building and > judging from how the other syscalls use it, I should have the > error path down the right way as well.
how does "bhs 0f" convey "branch to __syscall_error" ? -mike _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
