On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 10:54, Peter Mazinger wrote: > How does it come, that glibc does not need .size directive on these files > (crti.o and crtn.o) but uClibc would need them?
please dont top post. i didnt say the .size is necessary for uClibc, it's just always desirable for objects to have their proper size declared. then ELF parsers (like gdb and objdump) can properly label things. if it isnt possible with the init/fini sections because the symbol is split, then dropping the .size makes sense. -mike _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
