On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Peter Mazinger <[email protected]> wrote: > I am for only one implementation (that should go only into libc), else you > have unpredictable/different results depending on which linking order you > choose libc/libpthread
Austin's patch in the -future branch does accomplish this, but as it stands, it completely eliminates the special handling of the SIGCANCEL/SIGSETXID bits in sigfillset() and sigprocmask(). For sigfillset() this causes a mismatch between glibc behavior (N-2 bits set) and uClibc behavior (N bits set). My patch reinstates the special handling for both functions, although this causes the sigprocmask() behavior to no longer match glibc. If that is a problem, I can change it and resubmit. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
