-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:09:43 -0700 > Von: Maksim Rayskiy <[email protected]> > An: Rich Felker <[email protected]>, Peter Mazinger <[email protected]> > CC: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [PATCH v2] pread_write.c: added cancellation for all > architectures
> Hi, > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Rich Felker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I vote for removing the emulation completely. > > > > I can remove the fallback code from the patch if you agree on that, > but I cannot even compile it for architectures that do not support > pread/pwrite syscalls. > How is it to be tested then? if you remove it, then it can't be tested anymore (it will go to stubs.c and return -1/setting ENOSYS probably -haven't read manual to see if that applies). If we remove fallback codes generally, that should not be a one-man-decision, see how list reacts, maybe we can agree upon some rule Peter -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
