On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Peter Mazinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:17, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> >> master is now potentially open to
>> >> - merge future into master
>> >> - merge prelink into master
>> >> - merge ldso-future into master
>> >> (in this order).
>> >>
>> >> To do this, ideally one would bring future up to date, then merge it
>> >> back into master etc.
>> >>
>> >> Peter, do you see fit to
>> >> $ git checkout future
>> >> $ git pull --rebase (provided future is a proper tracking branch)
>> >> $ git push -v
>> >> $ git checkout master
>> >> $ git merge origin/future
>> >> # edit
>> >> $ git add some/thing
>> >> $ git commit -s some/thing
>> >> etc, etc?
>> >>
>> >> Current future would most likely conflict in e.g. longjmp impl i.e.
>> >> would need to be resolved after such merge (and i didn't look, TBH).
>> >>
>> >> Any takers? Khem, do you have time to explain and resolve that with
>> >> peter? Anybody else?
>> >
>> > as long as the crap is pruned out (things like wrong commits that are
>> > later reverted) ... i'd also like to see partial/broken commits get
>> > squashed together.
>>
>> I am stabbing at the future branch. So far I have managed to compile
>> it on nptl with arm, ppc, x86
>> and x86_64 and it ends up with linking errors on mips which seems like
>> its exceeding GOT size
>> but dont know for sure. Error is usual suspect
>>
>> libc/stdlib/system.c:208: relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_CALL16
>> against `_pthread_cleanup_pop_restore'
>>
>> but it does not boot completely. There is some bug lurking somewhere
>> need to hunt
>
> does it not boot in mips or all the others as well?

Same point of failure on all arches. It does boot partially but as I
said there is some regression
lurking somewhere.

>
>> that down. I have rebased fixed a few and squashed a few commits. The
>> rebased master is pushed
>> here
>> git://github.com/kraj/uClibc.git
>
> Is this the master, that fails on mips? I could take a look.

This is latest master + future branch rebased on top
with out future branch patches everything works hunky dory on all arches

> Have you put all the changes regarding [_]_pthread_cleanup_* into this master?
>

I have taken in all the patches that were on future branch if these
patches are additional
then I have not taken them

>> There are some patches on top which I have not pushed yet. The patches
>> there are all from the branch
>>
>> I will start cherry picking commits which are least disruptive.
>
> thanks working on it, Peter
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Khem
>>
>>
>> > -mike
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > uClibc mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> uClibc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>
> --
> NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren!
> Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to