-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:04:36 -0700 > Von: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > An: Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> > CC: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: proposal for CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 15:47, Peter Mazinger wrote: > >> I am proposing to add CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL to guard all config options > that > > > > ive found this option to be wholly useless in the kernel. i dont see > > it being any different in any other project. > > > > what does seem to work is manually adding "(EXPERIMENTAL)" or > > "(DEPRECATED)" to the Kconfig line of text. > > yes that seems a good approach Even if I do not think, that people are reading the text (they are using some preprepared .config files and are not confronted with the fact, that they should read the text in Kconfig), I can live with that too ;-) Peter > > > > >> This way we limit the general bug reports to working configs, > > > > bugs are bugs. if you want to classify them "lower", bugzilla has a > > priority field in it already. > > -mike > > _______________________________________________ > > uClibc mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc > > > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
