On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 04:05:35PM +0200, Peter Mazinger wrote: > > Can't we ensure that the necessary type is defined somewhere? > > My understanding for a libc is that we try to expose to userspace a common > interface, hiding specialities of the kernel. > Let's see what others think...
It would have been nice if the kernel had simply exposed a common kernelspace interface to begin with, instead of trying to be a clone of every cpu-vendor-specific proprietary unix... Rich _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
