On Jul 9, 2011 9:06 AM, "Bernhard Reutner-Fischer" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jul 9, 2011 1:12 AM, "Daniel Mack" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Daniel Mack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Attached is patch that is not yet meant for inclusion but for RFC > > > only. I can split it up into multiple smaller pieces once I know that > > > it's basically ok. > > > > > > Some parts of the patch move symbols from libc to libresolv, according > > > to the header files they're defined in and also to bring it in sync > > > with what glibc does. > > > > > > Also, I haven't done a lot of testing yet, and major parts are just > > > copied over from NetBSD's libc implementation and amended according to > > > uClibc's internals. > > > > FWIW, here's a new version of this RFC which adds some more details. > > > > In particular, it provides basic stubs for some of the functions in execinfo.h. > > > > Again - this is just for sharing my work and to get feedback about the approach. > > > All functions should remain in Linbc, the libresolv stub should be kept as-is (as a dummy lib) . How big is it, size (1) wise resp. Bloat-o-meter wise?
s/encode_bitsring/encode_bitstring/g > > Cheers, _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
