On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:31:02AM +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote: > > If __NR_open isn't defined, as for new architectures in Linux, then we > should be using the openat syscall instead. The easiest way to do this > is to simply invoke the open() function.
No, that's not the same. open() is a cancellation point, and the whole point of the not_cancel version is not to be a cancellation point... As far as I can tell this patch is invalid and potentially dangerous. Rich _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
