> -----Original Message----- > From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 9:58 PM > To: Stern, Eli > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] daemon: block SIGHUP on MMU > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:57:22AM +0200, Stern, Eli wrote: > >... > >+#ifdef __ARCH_USE_MMU__ > >+ /* Upon _exit of the parent we may get a HUP that we do not want. */ > >+ sigemptyset(&new_set); > >+ sigaddset(&new_set, SIGHUP); > >+ fd = sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &new_set, &old_set); > >+#else > >... > > > >I have tested this on my platform. It does not work. > > So what about the "ignore" i also sent?
Like I said before, this does not address the problem, just attempts to go around it. This type of "solution" is bound to raise new problems instead of fixing the root cause of the problem. Eli Stern --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
