On 2011-11-27, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 23 November 2011 18:39:50 Rich Felker wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:35:24PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > at this point, you're just wasting people's time. uClibc is not broken. >> > you're barking up the wrong tree. >> >> This sounds unsettlingly drepperesque... > > there is no information to show uClibc is broken. i don't think it's broken. > > glibc doesn't seem to have a problem with building abort() with noreturn.
Yes it does. Glibc has the exact same problem: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-08/msg00060.html > so until there is more information that shows a change in uClibc is > necessary, he is wasting people's time. -- Grant _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
