On 15/01/2012 19.37, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 15 January 2012 13:23:54 Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Sunday 15 January 2012 13:11:58 Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> As suggested by Bernhard, there is no point in evaluating the >>> compiler's flag availability when cleaning, so skip things in >>> that case. If there are variables that change targets based on >>> the flags, then things are already broken and need fixing >>> independently. >> >> this improves my `make clean` time from ~2.4s to ~1.5s. i should >> be able shave some more off that by fixing up the include_clean >> target. > > ok, that's been committed. the biggest slowdown now is just the > recursive makes (mostly in test/).
this is where -j helped in the original patch. carmelo > -mike > > > > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing > list uClibc@uclibc.org > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
