On 18 January 2012 08:31, Carmelo AMOROSO <[email protected]> wrote: >> but the patch is good to go in with testcase added as Mike pointed >> > > ok, I'll manage to integrate your one in the testsuite infrastructure.
That'd be great. > > As a note aside, we have discovered some minor problems (not blocking) > in the way the symbol scope is managed in libdl when a library is > already present in the start-up list (not dlopen-ed). I haven't yet a > test case to show the issue anyway. > It's not blocking anyway the 0.9.33 IMO. Yes, we will put that into an 0.9.33.1. thanks, > > Further there is probably a mem leak in the local scope of the > dependencies. We'll see to fix. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
