On 26/01/2012 17.08, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> On 16/12/2011 18.36, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >>>> On 16/12/11 15:57, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: >>>>> I was able to fix the issue like this: >>>>> >>>>> --- uClibc-0.9.33/libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/sigaction.c.orig >>>>> 2011-12-03 18:55:45.000000000 +0100 >>>>> +++ uClibc-0.9.33/libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/sigaction.c >>>>> 2011-12-14 11:48:52.000000000 +0100 >>>>> @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ >>>>> >>>>> return __libc_sigaction (sig, act, oact); >>>>> } >>>>> -libc_hidden_proto(sigaction) >>>>> +hidden_proto(sigaction) >>>>> weak_alias (__sigaction, sigaction) >>>>> -libc_hidden_weak(sigaction) >>>>> +hidden_weak(sigaction) >>>>> >>>>> #else >>>>> >>> ... >> >> I have now some free time to look at pending patches. It's on my queue. > > I don't want to nag, but since I just had some time to work on my > ARM toolchain crosstool-ng build I thought to let you know that > with yesterday's git eb72efd this issue is still present. > > Johannes > Hello, I don't think this fix is the best one; is rather a w/a. I'm reviewing the code as it seems we have a mess with sigaction symbols/aliased between libc and libpthread.
Carmelo _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
