On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > Fcntl{,64} is a nightmare, yes. But your hunk does not strike me as > immediately helpful. > arm/ioperm hidden def removal is OK, I think, without having sources at > hand. > The socketcall hunk is nonsense, see my previous reply to Peter in this > thread. > > +-# provided via pthreads builddir +-CSRC-y := $(filter-out $(libc_a_CSRC) > $(notdir $(libpthread_libc_OBJS:.o=.c)),$(CSRC-y)) +-SSRC := $(filter-out > $(libc_a_SSRC) $(notdir $(libpthread_libc_OBJS:.o=.S)),$(SSRC)) > Huh? Sounds inappropriate to me. > Oh, filtering later on makes sense, so OK, good catch! > > +-ifeq ($(IS_EABI),y) ++ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM_EABI),y) > But _that_ is a step backwards, NACK.
yes most of my patches are cobbled up on top to get to a compiling state so it could be a garbage to hide another garbage _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
