On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:35:19 -0500 Rich Felker <[email protected]> wrote: <...> > On the other hand, if you want to include 75% of the functional code > needed for posix_spawn, why not go ahead and include the last 25% so > that it actually works?
Because worse is better. Today things will compile, tomorrow they will work. I hope. > If there's something wrong with the glibc version you've mostly > copied, I also have a from-scratch version in musl that's probably > mildly lighter. I might take a look at it later. Thanks. I just need more spare time :/.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
