On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:12:49PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:11:41PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34:06PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > >On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:00:44PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:11:37AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote: > > >> > > > >> > The sigaction, sigprocmask, and sigfillset static link issue has > > >> > already been addressed in the future branch back in Apr. 2011, but the > > >> > future branch is not merged yet. > > >> > > > >> > Until then, you can try to cherry-pick the following patches manually. > > >> > 8ab3145f396eb35d15466b0666270ba8dad69da5 > > >> > aed47156856366c6aaf29a54e68fed39733f6bce > > >> > > >> With those patches applied to uClibc-0.9.33 my application > > >> linked successfully. (I cannot test if it runs atm, though.) > > > > This should be fixed on the 0.9.33 branch now, ok? > > I'm sorry for slow reply, I'm busy atm but I'll test 0.9.33 branch asap.
And now I finally did. I built the tip of the 0.9.33 branch (6dc563a7), i.e. I applied the output of "git diff v0.9.33..remotes/origin/0.9.33" to uClibc-0.9.33.tar.xz. With the resulting toolchain I built a statically linked iperf-2.0.5 and let it run on my target board. Not an exhaustive test but so far it worked fine. Thanks Johannes _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
