On Monday 02 April 2012 06:13:39 Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote: > Using: > DL_LOADADDR_BASE(DL_GET_LOADADDR_MAPADDR(load_addr, header)), 1); > for sure we are safe, even if the original purpose of > DL_GET_LOADADDR_MAPADDR was to return the map address or load address > according to the architectures, perhaps it should be worth to change the > name of the macro to something like DL_GET_ADDRESS or something else.
DL_GET_RUN_ADDR() ? > Let me know, so that I will post the final version. i just tested it and seems to work. so let's fix up these nits and get this thing in :). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
