On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> After seeing a problem report involving one of the O_NONBLOCK >> "derivatives," I looked through the tree to see what else might be >> affected. Here is what I found: > > We already have this kind of patch in future branch IIRC
I think TFD_NONBLOCK and IN_NONBLOCK are still missing on both master and future? _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
