I think it can be, but seems no one did it yet. Amos? On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 18:25 +0100, Ed W wrote: > On 16/04/2012 15:22, Alexander Komyagin wrote: > > Hi, Ed. Which version of uclibc you are using? > > > > I've spent a lot of time in that particular case with getaddrinfo(), and > > as of 0.9.32 it behaves correctly. Make sure that this problem is really > > related to resolving (try plain old sectioned printf debugging :) ). > > > > Also try the attached patch to see if it helps. > > Is this patch included in master? If not, can it be? > > It's not a solution to my specific problem, but it seems like a good > performance fix and it got an ACK so I think it should get pulled? > > Thanks > > Ed W > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
-- Best wishes, Alexander Komyagin _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
