On 23 April 2012 18:12, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 21 April 2012 19:36, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Let's leave this out for the merge and look at it after the merge >>> (unless you can fix it for the failing arches), ok? >>> >>> I'm going through the other commits during the weekend (I have a few >>> remarks). >>> >> >> Yes thats a good plan I think. However there are some cleanup fixes that >> are sort of obvious and some bug fixes that we can safely take after testing
http://uclibc.org/~aldot/uClibc/psm-future.tar.gz (300k, I'm now about to start a little bit of testing) > My notes so far: > > include/sched.h: remove __clone{,2} > libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c: vis of __uclibc_progname? Why not hidden? > : _dl_skip_args only for SH ?! > libc/misc/internals/tempname.h: __gen_tempname duplicated in nptl.. vis > public? > libc/sysdeps/linux/arm/posix_fadvise.c: __NR___syscall_arm_fadvise64_64 ? > "[PATCH 382/408] linuxthreads: use __UCLIBC_HAS_TLS__ consistently" impossible > impossible combo for __resp > syslog.c: disable locking in setlogmask (why?) > pread_write.c: endianess broken? if so use __LONG_LONG_PAIR() ! > > Care to comment? > > TIA, _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
