On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Another thing: with LD_SO_CACHE=y O_CLOEXEC is not defined (you removed all 
>> the
>> _GNU_SOURCE and we did not yet adjust it for susv4) so ldso fails to build 
>> with:
>>  CC ldso/ldso/ldso.oS
>> In file included from ldso/ldso/ldso.c:1432:0:
>> ldso/ldso/dl-elf.c: In function '_dl_map_cache':
>> ldso/ldso/dl-elf.c:54:45: error: 'O_CLOEXEC' undeclared (first use in
>> this function)
>
> Disregard this, i had to fix your OABI vs EABI check since otherwise
> pregen headers
> barfed (since the did not include the config). Fixed now by including
> uClibc_config.h in the
> arm arch_features before the abi check.

I have some patches on top too which are not on the branch I posted
this was one of them

From 7ff5e8b59f629bc83f4dbaf7d76dbecccf50b122 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:54:17 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] includes: uClibc_arch_features.h now depends on
 uClibc_config.h

Adjust for the dependency so include features.h from
libc-symbols.h which is included on compiler cmdline
which otherwise misses the symbols from uClibc_config.h
since it only included bits/uClibc_arch_features.h

So we include both bits/uClbc_configs.h and bits/uClibc_arch_features.h
in features.h and include features.h in libc-symbols.h
which then takes care of dependencies

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
---
 include/features.h     |    1 +
 include/libc-symbols.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Index: git/include/libc-symbols.h
===================================================================
--- git.orig/include/libc-symbols.h     2012-02-07 21:09:02.885347078 -0800
+++ git/include/libc-symbols.h  2012-02-07 21:11:56.097355232 -0800
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@

    */

+#define __need_uClibc_config_h
+# include <bits/uClibc_config.h>
+#undef __need_uClibc_config_h
 #include <bits/uClibc_arch_features.h>

 /* Enable declarations of GNU extensions, since we are compiling them.  */
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to