On 4 May 2012 01:22, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 03 May 2012 04:58:24 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> Mike, it would have been much simpler to just leave the header impl-free > > yes, and it would cause unused bloat in the C lib. the func is dirt simple, > so for the rare case where someone actually calls this, they get a few memory > lookup/compares. for everyone else, there is no overhead with an unused > function in the C library. > >> --- a/include/stdlib.h >> +++ b/include/stdlib.h >> >> -__nonnull ((1)) __wur >> -static inline int rpmatch (__const char *__response) >> +/* __THROW */ >> +static __inline __nonnull ((1)) __wur int rpmatch (__const char >> *__response) > > i don't see what the problem is here. the code compiles fine for me with C > and > C++ compilers.
it did not parse for me, libcheck (from check.sf.net) was misconfigured due to parse errors in the above. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
