On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:07:15PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:19:48PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 May 2012 12:29:57 Rich Felker wrote: > > > Would it be possible to head in the direction of not neeting > > > CROSS_COMPILE/CROSS? That is, make it so the build system just works > > > with cross compiling as long as CC is set to the right compiler? I can > > > think of a few potential issues like the way stripping is performed > > > that might need a cross-specific tool other than CC > > > > the current system uses ar and nm and ld directly. the first two could be > > moved to partial linking so there's only ld and cc, but i don't know if you > > can do partial linking with gcc easily. obviously stripping would still > > need > > to be sep, but i think stripping isn't done by default, so that isn't a big > > deal. > [...] > As for stripping, it is done by default: the build system builds > busybox_unstripped with -g then uses strip to produce the plain
DOH! Somehow I was thinking this discussion was on the busybox list not the uclibc one... Sorry for the noise. Rich _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
